Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submit | hjek's commentslogin


> package-management / CI system that pulls directly from github

How would this be different than git submodules?


2 points by shader 77 days ago | link

> How would this be different than git submodules?

Most of the difference would be in the user interface. Git submodules might actually be a great idea for how to implement it, to encourage hacking on and submitting changes to the libraries themselves.

Git submodules don't provide a very friendly user experience though. You have to know the repository url and manage them separately. It's not terrible, but it's extra work, and doesn't handle loading the library in your own, or dependency management. Ideally, pulling in a package would also result in pulling in all of its dependencies, without pulling in multiple copies of the same library the way npm used to.

There are a lot more features that could be offered by an actual package system.


5 points by hjek 78 days ago | link | parent | on: Next steps

* Unvote (like HN)

* File upload. On the News site I run, users do this in the roundabout way of uploading files to non-free services like Google Drive or Dropbox and then link to them.

* Ecommerce


4 points by shader 77 days ago | link

> Unvote (like HN)

That would be nice I suppose, but we can't actually modify the arclanguage forum, so it would be of limited benefit. I guess a lot of people come to arc because they want to run an HN clone though, so it might be worth pursuing.

> File upload

Yeah, I think enhancing some of the fundamental web-service functionality in arc would be good. Beyond file upload, better support for OAuth, ssl, etc. would be good too.

> Ecommerce

Good idea. Not sure how to make that better myself, but demystifying and enabling easy ecommerce would be cool.

I think that also has the same motivation for the previous category; we need better support for web application development, because that's what most people want to do.


3 points by hjek 76 days ago | link

It's true that unvote wouldn't make it to Arc Forum as it's never updated, but the same is true for any new feature, sadly.

Regarding SSL, I've been working on an example Nginx + LetsEncrypt secure reverse proxy configuration for Arc,

It's just insane that Arc Forum doesn't encrypt HTTP but, well, as you write, we can't change Arc Forum. Maybe they'll update it some day, or someone will set up an unofficial one that's more up to date?

Regarding web application development, there's already an interesting web based app development interface,

It looks quite humble but it has both a repl and an interface for saving/running various web apps.

I've set it to be enabled by default in Anarki. And it's only available for admins, because it can run system commands. I wonder if it would be possible to allow any user to develop apps securely, e.g. by disabling unsafe commands or sandboxing it somehow? Perhaps there is a simple way of doing that? It could open Arc web app development up to any user of an Anarki driven page.

I think those features mentioned above still need better documentation, too.

Other HN features that Anarki News is lacking:

* favourites

* hide item

* past front pages

* show all stories from same site by clicking on domain name


Personally I find that the 'killer feature' is Racket integration as Racket has quite an extensive well-documented standard library (and FFI so that's all C libraries as well).

Even if Arc doesn't get much attention itself, it still benefits from the work going into Racket.

So there are a lot of libraries available. (Arc's Racket integration still has a few rough edges, particularly regarding keyword arguments, but there are workarounds.)

One interesting library is this video editing DSL,


2 points by shader 80 days ago | link

That doesn't really qualify as a 'killer feature' for Arc; it doesn't provide any incentive for someone to learn and use Arc - and keep using it - over just learning Racket in the first place.

I do agree that it dramatically improves the value of Arc over being written as a stand-alone interpreter. And providing easier access to Racket features may be a good idea. It helps bootstrap Arc, like Clojure on the JVM with the Java standard libraries until proper clj wrappers are written.


3 points by hjek 78 days ago | link

I do know some Racket, and for me this exact feature did provide an incentive for me to learn and use Arc, because I could apply what I already knew.

Arc feels more brief and less strict, so in some cases it's more pleasant to use than Racket.

When I found out about Arc's Racket interop a couple of years ago, I was really surprised that this was not documented anywhere, so I added a section in the Readme.


3 points by shader 77 days ago | link

I agree it's important, and we should probably develop it and make it easier because it's an important foundation. However, there aren't that many Racket developers, and its not really the best argument in favor of using a language that it just happens to be a better version of another language. That might be a competitive advantage against Racket, but what about compared to other interpreted languages? Why would someone want to use arc over Python or Ruby?

> When I found out about Arc's Racket interop a couple of years ago, I was really surprised that this was not documented anywhere, so I added a section in the Readme.

Yeah, the documentation could use some work. Definitely not our competitive advantage at the moment, though that could be changed if we build on our interactive help system.

Also, that feature is really only part of anarki. I don't think arc3.1 had that feature. I think at this point it seems like pg has pretty well abandoned arc though, so maintaining compatibility shouldn't be a primary concern.


2 points by akkartik 77 days ago | link

Hmm, I don't think pg has abandoned Arc. And I don't think maintaining compatibility is a concern even so. So far Arc has made no compatibility guarantees. We're all forking pre-alpha software. So it's conceivable the hundred-year language will have features from Anarki. Forks that restrict where they get good ideas from will be outcompeted by forks that don't.

Though lately I consider it more likely that a hundred-year language will have a leveled-up conception of "compatiblity", one that assumes orders of magnitude more forking activity. (See "the Zen of Mu" at the bottom of; Mu is my attempt at building out the foundations for a hundred-year stack. With, perchance, something like Arc on top.) Perhaps Arc shouldn't be a single language but a family of forks ( Not a single tree but a clonal colony ( That'll only work if we can make it easy for superficially-incompatible forks to exchange features and functionality back and forth. Which is an unsolved problem so far. So we may well be very far from a hundred-year language.

Anyways, this tangent is my contribution. I don't have a short-term answer for how to solve Arc's users-vs-libraries chicken-and-egg problem ^_^


4 points by shader 76 days ago | link

> I don't have a short-term answer for how to solve Arc's users-vs-libraries chicken-and-egg problem ^_^

Be the change you want to see in the world... I'm not really sure how to motivate the community, but I am rather attached to it, even if I have been a very infrequent lurker over the past years. We have had a relatively high amount of discussion over the past few days though...

I don't think we can just expect to flip a switch and suddenly get a community; we have to /be/ a community, and then people might be willing to join us.


3 points by shader 76 days ago | link

Maybe we should emphasize the flexibility of our language designs by making the language itself more modular. It would be challenging from a compatibility/dependency standpoint, but those are problems we might have to solve anyway. It would help to have better isolation of components.


2 points by hjek 76 days ago | link

I agree.

Some newbie friendly documentation to ns.arc would be great, or perhaps some very simple examples. Have you tried using ns.arc?


2 points by rocketnia 72 days ago | link

It looks like I might've subtly broken ns.arc with my own changes to make Anarki installable as a Racket package. Here's an example that should be working, but currently isn't:

  ; my-file.arc
  (= n 2)
  (= my-definition (* n n))
    (= my-definition
      (let my-ns (nsobj)
        ; Populate the namespace with the current namespace's bindings.
        (each k (ns-keys current-ns)
          ; Racket has a variable called _ that raises an error when
          ; used as an expression, and it looks like an Arc variable, so
          ; we skip it. This is a hack. Maybe it's time to change how
          ; the Arc namespace works. On the other hand, copying
          ; namespaces in this naive way is prone to this kind of
          ; problem, so perhaps it's this technique that should be
          ; changed.
          (unless (is k '||)
            (= my-ns.k current-ns.k)))
        ; Load the file.
        (w/current-ns my-ns (load "my-file.arc"))
        ; Get the specific things you want out of the namespace.
  arc> n
  _n: undefined;
   cannot reference an identifier before its definition
    in module: "/home/nia/mine/drive/repo/mine/prog/repo/not-mine/anarki/ac.rkt"
The idea is, you create an empty Arc namespace with (nsobj), you use `w/current-ns` to load a file into it, and you use `a!b` or `a.b` syntax to manipulate individual entries.

An "Arc namespace" is just a convenience wrapper over a Racket namespace that automatically converts between Arc variables `foo` and their corresponding Racket variables `_foo`.

For some overall background...

I wrote ns.arc when I didn't have much idea what Racket namespaces or modules could do, but I was at least sure that changing the compiled Arc code to more seamlessly interact with Racket's `current-namespace` would open up ways to load Arc libraries without them clobbering each other. It wouldn't be perfect because of things like unhygienic macros, but it seemed like a step in the right direction.

I went a little overboard with the idea that Racket namespaces and Racket modules could be manipulated like Arc tables. However, that was the only clear vision I had when I embarked on writing the ns.arc library, so I approximated it as well as I could anyway. In fact, I don't think the utilities for generating first-class modules (like `simple-mod` and `make-modecule`) are all that useful, because as I understand a little better now, Racket modules are as complicated as they are mainly to support separate compilation, so generating them at run time doesn't make much sense.

I'm still finding out new things about what these can do, though. Something I didn't piece together until just now was that Racket has a Racket has a `current-module-name-resolver` parameter which can let you run arbitrary code in response to a top-level (require ...) form. I presume this would let you keep track of all the modules required this way so you can `namespace-attach-module` them to another namespace later. Using this, the kind of hackish partial-namespace-copying technique I illustrate above can probably be made into something pretty robust after all, as long as Anarki sets `current-module-name-resolver` to something specific and no other code ever changes it. :-p


3 points by rocketnia 62 days ago | link

I tinkered with Anarki a whole bunch and finally got this working smoothly. There was a missing step, because it turns out we need to load certain Racket-side bindings into a namespace in order to be able to evaluate Arc code there. It seems more obvious in hindsight. :)

I approached this with the secondary goal of letting a Racket program (or a determined Arc program) instantiate multiple independent intances of Anarki. The ac.rkt module was the only place we were performing side effects when a Racket module was visited, and Racket's caching of modules makes it hard to repeat those side effects on demand, so I moved most of them into a procedure called `anarki-init`.

By adding one line to the example I gave...

  (= my-definition
    (let my-ns (nsobj)
      ; Load the Arc builtins into the namespace so we can evaluate
      ; code.
      (w/current-ns my-ns ($.anarki-init))

      ...)) becomes possible to evaluate Arc code in that namespace, and the example works.

I used issue #95 on GitHub to track this task, and I talk about it a little more there:

Before I started on that, I did a bunch of cleanup to get the Anarki unit tests and entrypoints running smoothly on all our CI platforms. To get started on this cleanup, I had a few questions hjek and akkartik were able to discuss with me on issue #94:

A lot of the problems I'm fixing here are ones I created, so it's a little embarrassing. :) It's nice to finally put in some of this missing work, though. I want to say thanks to shader and hjek for talking about modules and packages, provoking me to work on this stuff!


3 points by akkartik 62 days ago | link

And thank you :) I'm glad you got something out of it, because the project's certainly better for it.


3 points by shader 76 days ago | link


I was confused for a second or two, because the current top post on that site is almost identical to the one you commented on a year ago.

(What are you working on this week? by caius)


2 points by hjek 76 days ago | link

> Forks that restrict where they get good ideas from will be outcompeted by forks that don't.

That is so true. LibreOffice and Gitea come to mind, but also what happened with io.js/nodejs.


4 points by i4cu 78 days ago | link

I think it is a killer feature in a round-about way. I believe the killer feature is actually generic and robust database integration. There's a whole lot of people who start with data on hand and need to hack together an app from there. The starting point to db integration is racket, which also gets you access to other libraries. Once in place arc libs can be created eliminating a need to even learn racket (just like there are plenty of clojure programmers who don't know java).

IMO doing package integration first is putting the cart before the horse.


3 points by shader 77 days ago | link

> the killer feature is actually generic and robust database integration

That could be a killer feature, but I don't think we have it developed yet. I certainly wouldn't have thought of it. Basically, when I say "killer feature", I'm thinking of the specialization or distinguishing characteristic that we would emphasize in a Quick Start tutorial.

When arc was first launched, the "arc challenge" of building a multi-action website with a form in only ~5 lines of code was the "special feature." Right now, I think hackability and simplicity of the syntax are two of the better things, but we could probably specialize on more.

> IMO doing package integration first is putting the cart before the horse

The purpose for working on package integration is to enable further development. Without the ability to share code easily, it's a lot harder to build on and benefit from community effort. In itself, I agree, a package manager is boring and probably not a killer feature. However, making it really easy to start building something useful by searching for and loading relevant code straight from the interactive console would be a pretty big step.

Perhaps the specialty I'm looking for is exploratory programming, which we've mentioned before. Our interactive help system is pretty good. The only problem others have mentioned before was that Python is arguably better, just because there are already examples and libraries for doing most activities, whereas Arc requires a lot of development effort just to get fundamental components working.


2 points by hjek 76 days ago | link

> Without the ability to share code easily, it's a lot harder to build on and benefit from community effort.

I've just been dumping my Arc experiments into the Anarki repository. Akkartik manages it by the policy that pretty much anyone can commit anything, so I haven't had any issues sharing my code. I've recently put a Puredata compiler in Arc in there,

That said, there is an Arc package manager, Hackinator by awwx.

Perhaps that is worth a look?

The interactive help in Anarki is great, although there are some undocumented functions. A great improvement, which would be very easy to implement, would be to add the documentation from the various Arc sites to the Anarki interactive help.


3 points by i4cu 77 days ago | link

Well there's that, but honestly... exploratory programming with a tool that can't provide basic functionality will limit how much you can explore. I think you mean 'language design exploration'? - if so I'll stop right there, since, well, frankly... it's not my wheelhouse. :)

> package integration first is putting the cart before the horse

I'm simply saying that features like db integration bring users, users bring manpower, manpower will provide package management in a way that ensures it accounts for more use cases, but again this is moot if what you're interested in is only the language development arena. Though I'm not sure how you could prove out a language unless you can actually use it for real world work.

P.S. If you want users, then killer feature would = todo list mobile app with local db in 30 lines of code!



3 points by shader 76 days ago | link

> exploratory programming with a tool that can't provide basic functionality will limit how much you can explore

Absolutely true, which is why I do think the Racket integration is important, so we can just wrap its many and powerful libraries in lighter-weight arc libs, and also why I think a decent package system is important. It needs to be easy to share code, and to find solutions to problems. Otherwise everyone spends too much time rebuilding the same wheels.

> features like db integration bring users

Absolutely. I think better db support in arc would be awesome to have. Especially if we can build an ecosystem where "intelligent defaults" are the norm, so that 90% of the time the exploratory developer can get a db up and running with 1-2 lines.

> todo list mobile app with local db in 30 lines of code

An admirable goal. That's actually a great idea of something we could work toward as a community project, each building pieces that eventually come together to make a decent modern app.

Were you thinking a mobile friendly web app, or trying to run it natively on a phone? I'm not really sure how the latter would work... Though building a compatible javascript base for arc would be pretty nice. I do like being able to use consistent code for both clients and servers, as in node and clojure.


2 points by i4cu 76 days ago | link

> Were you thinking a mobile friendly web app, or trying to run it natively on a phone?

The java/js ecosystem has the largest reach making it the easy choice. One could work on a js compiler and target pouchDB as a starting point. That said choosing js also makes Arc go further down the path Clojure has already gone putting the two closer together, and with Clojure being so far ahead in that arena then maybe it's doomed to fail. The other way to go is to do what Clojure is not great at. iOS development? maybe integration with swift? At any rate I'm not a language development guy. I can only tell you what would appeal to me. I mostly use Clojure and a really easy to use arc->iOS app development ecosystem would be really cool.


Looks interesting. But is anyone actually able to run this?

Parrot is apparently a VM that Perl6 runs on, but the install script throws a syntax error when run with Perl6. With Perl5 it complains about a missing `parrot_config`.


2 points by akkartik 94 days ago | link

No I didn't try it..


2 points by hjek 116 days ago | link | parent | on: How Rebol's macros differ from Lisp's

Sadly, the Rebol license is source-available but non-free,

> * You cannot modify the software or the license.[1]


The example of making a message visible through a variable is simple in Arc (and afaict, in Scheme, too),

    (def gt10 (v c) (if (> v 10) (c)))
    (let msg "hello" (gt10 30 [pr msg]))
    ; "hello"
I wonder why that's so problematic in Common Lisp?


1 point by akkartik 115 days ago | link

You're passing in a function to gt10, and the article does admit that that is doable everywhere:

"The trick is to change the unit of currency from passing source code to passing functions."

But try passing in '(pr msg) as a list to gt10.


Hy doesn't have linked lists or tail call optimisation, but it has pretty cool bidirectional interop, i.e. you can write Python in Lisp, and also you can just import Hy modules into existing Python code, and even use the Python debugger for Lisp code.

I personally find the Python syntax super annoying; the colons after `if` and `else`, the `@` decorator syntax, its whitespace sensitivity, all the __underscores__, etc., so it's nice that someone are doing for Python what Clojure is doing for Java.


1 point by hjek 148 days ago | link | parent | on: Poll: What's the best payment system?

Perhaps the vote only got saved in your profile and not in the item.


2 points by hjek 148 days ago | link | parent | on: Poll: What's the best payment system?

On #stripe IRC, someone pointed me to this, , a free software replacement for Stripe.js

I've read about Paypal freezing Wikileaks' account. And, it seems that Paypal have closed off their REST API, and only SDKs for various languages -- not including Racket.


3 points by i4cu 147 days ago | link

It seems to me that most of the web does not care about a free software option. So why, may I ask, do you?

Personally, I see Stripe as being a trustworthy source and I'd much rather use a non-free version from a trustworthy source than a free version from an untrustworthy source. Yeah you can read the code, but no one is going to do that anyways (besides there's more to it than just looking for something nefarious in the code, you also have to make sure there are no missing parts that lead to vulnerabilities and unless you know what the missing parts are....)

edit: also do a paypal search on HN and you should see their reputation is terrible from a vendor perspective. I think their success is largely due to being the first on the market and establishing a significant base at a time when using cc's on the internet was scary and hard. But stripe, and others, have changed the payment landscape. We can now use cc's for vendor payment with ease. So why Paypal? To cater to people without cc's?


2 points by hjek 144 days ago | link

You do have a point there, as probably most people on the web run non-free JS.

I'd of course argue that this doesn't mean that most people don't care -- because plenty people I know get real pissed off about video ads, anti-adblockers, pop-up forms, and all that jazz -- but they don't know that this is almost always non-free JS.

So, even if we were to assume that the non-free Stripe JS code is trustable, and ask people to run it, then I'd never recommend anyone to use a browser that runs non-free JS.

Yes, people can use adblockers, but there's plenty more nasty stuff non-free JS code can do, and does[1][2][3][4], so I wouldn't ask anyone to do that.

Yes, there could be free/libre JS malware, but like who'd ever do

   <script> /* Code to log users' keystrokes before they send their message */ </script>




Also, I'm a bit sad that HN was changed to disallow voting w/o JS, but that's mainly because it means you can't vote from Links or Emacs :-)


3 points by i4cu 143 days ago | link

> this doesn't mean that most people don't care -- because plenty people I know get real pissed off...

Those people you know who get pissed are either A: not representative of 'the web' or B: not caring enough to stop doing what they are doing. So I will stand by "most of the web does not care" (and yes I am inferring you have to care enough).

> I'd never recommend anyone to use a browser that runs non-free JS.

   "most of the web does not care"
Unfortunately this is the world we live in and trust is currently a staple of the internet even as scary as that is to some people.

I have to trust that stripe.js is secure - that's what I'm paying them for and if they get a bad reputation like Paypal has then people, including myself, will stop using them and stop paying them. Frankly for a cc payment type script I think their code should be audited by professionals that can see more than just keystroke loggers and if there are any vulnerabilites then the auditors should have the power to shut them down.

If at all you think I'm not on your side I'll suggest you're wrong as:

    * I deleted my facebook account 10 years ago.
    * I deleted my minimal Linked-in account 2 years ago.
    * I don't use an ad-blocker, but I: 
        * make mental notes not to buy their products because the ad pop'd up.
        * don't revisit websites that have ad pop up.
	* avoid sites that have ads.
Using an ad-blocker is admitting defeat and I'm not there yet!


3 points by hjek 142 days ago | link

First, congrats with getting of Facebook and Linked-In!

Yes, most of the web doesn't care about non-free JS.

However, for me, it's higher priority to do what I think is right, rather than what is popular. If I didn't care about free software, I'd just put stuff on Ebay instead.

That's also why I coded this new event calendar in Arc -- that you can check out in the Anarki repository -- because I'm part of this art collective where everyone have been publishing events exclusively on Facebook, which is super annoying when you don't want to be used by Facebook.

I wanted to make something that was as easy to use but free, because many artists can't be bothered to use FTP to edit plain text files, and all the PHP calendars I looked at were overengineered overcomplex piles of drupal.

Anyway, I might look into Paypals Python SDK, because Hy makes Python acceptable.


3 points by hjek 157 days ago | link | parent | on: How to use Racket keyword args in Arc?

I figured it out. Arc uses `lambda` from Mzscheme, and that version of `lambda` doesn't support keyword args. Trying to import Racket's `lambda` caused a conflict with the other `lambda`, so in the end I imported Racket's `keyword-apply` to do the job.

I have committed this code to the Anarki repo, so now everyone can use Racket keywords in their Arc programs. Yay!