Sure, I agree he was talking about that kind of consistency too. I spoke too matter-of-factly for once. ^_^
I was more specifically referring to the part at 31:17 where he had Inconsistency vs. Consistency on the slide and he explained the complexity as "taking a set of things that stand apart and trying to think of them all at the same time." He finished that line of thought with "And anybody who's tried to use a system that's eventually consistent knows that."
(Note that he's talking about eventual consistency as being on the "Inconsistency" side, which I guess is because an eventually consistent system is often on the way to consistency rather than being there.)
