Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
7 points by almkglor 5844 days ago | link | parent

Nope. After all, pg made Arc for hackers, who never make mistakes, and can write an Arc interpreter on bare metal by flipping switches in time to the processor's 100MHz bus clock.

This sounds like a good thing to add to the arc2c compiler anyway ^^. Certainly we could get a backtrace reasonably easily by actually inspecting the closure structures being passed as continuations, but we also have to determine a decent function-to-symbol mapping.



4 points by bOR_ 5844 days ago | link

it would be appreciated! :P. Functional programming helps because usually it is the last thing you wrote that is wrong, but occasionally I'm completely puzzled by error messages (only to find out that one of my comments started with a : rather than a ;.

-----

4 points by almkglor 5844 days ago | link

Hmm. Anyway it looks like it might be useful to subtype function closures into continuation and non-continuation functions (as an aside it would probably be useful also for optimizations: when a continuation function exits, it can't be called and its closure can be immediately freed or reused, unless we use 'ccc: and even so we could just copy the continuation into a non-continuation closure).

Then when a backtrace is requested we simply scan through the stack for continuation-type functions, and scan through their closures for continuation-types, and so on until we end up on a closure without any continuation-type functions.

-----

2 points by stefano 5844 days ago | link

While scanning the stack you have to pay attention to not include functional arguments as if they were called functions. To give descriptive names to functions I would transform every lambda expression in a named function, e.g. :

  (def f (x) x) --> (set f (fn (x) x)) --> (set f (__named '(f x) (x) x))
and for anonymous functions:

  (fn (a b) (+ a b)) --> (__named '(fn (a b)) (a b) (+ a b))

-----

1 point by almkglor 5843 days ago | link

> While scanning the stack you have to pay attention to not include functional arguments as if they were called functions.

Which is why I was proposing to subtype closures into continuations and non-continuations. Normal functions that are passed around are non-continuations, while continuation closures are created during CPS-conversion. Of course we probably need to add code in 'ccc which would probably copy a continuation closure into a non-continuation version of the closure.

-----