Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
2 points by eds 4737 days ago | link | parent

But at the very least, if both standard Arc and offshoot implementations both use system, they'll both break in the same way. Therefore code will still be "compatible" across Arc implementations (in that it will generate the same error messages on all implementations).

Yeah, I know that doesn't fix the problems you mentioned, and yes, I run Windows so I do encounter those problems with the vanilla Arc releases. But we can't expect a offshoot implementation to do anything about the problem, we really need pg to solve the problem at the source.



4 points by almkglor 4737 days ago | link

"Unix won" -- pg

http://www.paulgraham.com/arcll1.html

-----

7 points by absz 4736 days ago | link

While Unix did win, that doesn't mean that Unix's names won. It's Unix's features that won. So it's reasonable to provide certain operations, but implementing them in terms of (system "unix-command-name ...") is not.

Of course, I use Mac OS X, so it's not like I'm adversely impacted. But the point still stands.

-----

1 point by Metaprogrammer 4737 days ago | link

Any effort towards a strict definition of this kind of functionality ends up with something like R6RS (which is IMHO overbloated).

-----