Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
1 point by sacado 4586 days ago | link | parent

I'd tend to agree with your vision, almkglor. It is more generic than the other way around : the former can be modelized with the latter, but the opposite is not true. I think Arc should remain generic and thus leave us the choice.


2 points by nex3 4585 days ago | link

The problem is that Arc is not currently generic enough to allow both models. Only generic functions can be implemented with the primitives we're given - the core language has to be modified to allow arbitrary attachments.

-----