Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
3 points by Pauan 4081 days ago | link | parent

Ah, sorry, huge miscommunication and misunderstanding on my part. I've actually been agreeing with you all along.

A large part of the problem is that I've been thinking about my proposal as two separate parts: one part deals with backwards compat with Arc, and the other part describes a hyper-static system for Arc.

When I was talking about "defs", I was talking about the hyper-static part. But you were talking about the backwards compat part. Hilarity (?) ensues.



1 point by rocketnia 4080 days ago | link

Okay, we're on the same page now then. ^_^

Having both kinds of scope as options would be great.

-----