Oh, I can understand that point of view. Just because there were multiple examples doesn't mean each one introduced new requirements.
---
"It's obvious that you want to think in terms of package managers, and that's fine, but I really do not get the impression that's what they're talking about."
I just wanted to help you elaborate on the claims you're making about Nulan's namespace system. You originally quoted Casey McCann's examples, but I perceived them differently than you did, and I had trouble understanding your perception from your terse example code.
Now this seems to be resolved. We may not agree in our interpretations, but now I understand your claims relative to both of them. Thanks for your patience with me. ^_^
---
"Ultimately, it seems the only way to resolve this is to actually ask them what they meant."
I don't think that's necessary, but it would be interesting to know.