1 point by fallintothis 3349 days ago | link | parent `````` a.b vs dotted lists `````` I was trying to think of alternatives, thought "maybe a more complex symbol for one of the uses, like ..?", then wondered about a potential edge case. Really, I'm just thinking of the parsing algorithm---or, rather, lexing. If . was defined as the ssyntax is, would a..b expand into ((a) b)? Without spaces, it's fairly clear that certain arguments are "empty", since it could conceivably be tokenized as two .s. But a++b probably wouldn't tokenize to two +s. Suppose both . and .. were defined; how would a..b be resolved? Longest-operator-first?`````` f:g vs :syms `````` Could always go with another symbol for function composition. | comes to mind, but it's more like "reverse compose" at a Unix shell. On the other hand, as far as the function composition operator is concerned, I've seen mathematicians define it both ways---\$(f \circ g)(x) = f(g(x))\$ and \$(f \circ g)(x) = g(f(x))\$. No technical reason you couldn't use a pipe, just conventional.

 2 points by akkartik 3349 days ago | link Yeah, currently:`````` a..b => ((a) b) `````` My reflex: I'm ok with breaking this corner case and just treating it as a single op like infix a++b. Juxtaposing infix ops isn't really on my radar.Update: Hmm, a more valuable use case that I might have to give up:`````` f:~g `````` Update 4 hours later: Ah, perhaps I don't have to give it up! We could just define new operators:`````` mac (:~) (f g) `(: ,f (~ ,g)) mac (.-) (f n) `(,f (- ,n)) `````` Yeah, this could work. a..b is still challenging to define, though..-----
 1 point by fallintothis 3349 days ago | link Really, I'm just thinking of the parsing algorithm---or, rather, lexing.Oh yeah, and how does it work for negative number literals? I assume`````` (f n-1) --> (f (- n 1)) (f n - 1) --> (f (- n 1)) `````` because the minus either does or does not have spaces around it, but`````` (f n -1) --> (f n -1) `````` because the minus sign only has spaces on one side?-----
 1 point by akkartik 3349 days ago | link Yeah. I never treat an op as infix if it has whitespace on just one side.There is one ugly special-case here:`````` f.-1 ; => (f -1) `````` http://github.com/akkartik/wart/blob/8211614d63/014infix.cc#...-----