Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
1 point by rocketnia 4852 days ago | link | parent

I haven't tested it, but I don't see any bugs from here.

I'm a bit surprised you broke up the (if branches ...) condition into two places like that, though. I think it would have been simpler just to replace "(or then more-branches)" with "branches". ^^



1 point by akkartik 4852 days ago | link

:) Yeah I thought of that in the next CL.

-----