Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
1 point by evanrmurphy 5494 days ago | link | parent

> I think it's supposed to be like structure access from C-style languages

http://files.arcfn.com/doc/evaluation.html agrees with you. I may begin using it only in such contexts to help preserve the metaphor, meaning I'd stop taking shortcuts like car.xs for (car xs) because it's not an example of structure access (though xs.1 is).



1 point by evanrmurphy 5493 days ago | link

s/xs.1/xs.0/ for isomorphism with (car xs).

-----